For architects

See the reviewer’s comments before plan review does.

Predicted correction comments, each with the code section behind it
An engineered, code-checked packet your client can actually file
Calibrated to how this specific board reviews — not generic rules

Run a free package check Or join the marketplace

For licensed architects designing residential, mixed-use, and small commercial · No credit card to start

What the read looks like

Predicted reviewer comments

Sample

Parking schedule inconsistent
11 of 14 comparables flagged
Likely
Egress width at stair
IRC R311.7.1
Common
Fire separation, basement
IRC R302.13
Frequent
Zoning use confirmation
use-group letter
Occasional

Ranked from real correction histories at this board — every comment links to its source.

1.8M+

NJ permit decisions read

400+

Jurisdictions in the corpus

3.5K+

Correction patterns parsed

2.4K+

Board decisions tracked

Every figure traces back to a public source record, and each prediction is graded against the board’s actual decision when it lands — calibration is published, not asserted.

The reviewer's draft, before they write it

Comments are predictable. Revisions are not free.

Plan reviewers in every town see the same patterns over and over. Parking ratios. Egress widths. Fire separation notes. Zoning use confirmation. We track which comments show up, how often, and what fixes work — for every municipality you submit to.

Likely corrections, ranked

Before you hit submit, see the top 5–10 comments a reviewer would write — with the probability, the department, and the typical fix.

Comparable approved projects

Find the projects in the same town, same use group, same scope that did get approved. See the package they submitted. See the conditions they agreed to.

Code citations next to comments

Every predicted correction comes with the specific code section. IRC 2021 with the state amendments. Town-specific zoning chapters. No guessing.

Intelligence, not a referral fee

You bring the project. We bring the read on the town.

The marketplace at /pro is for architects who want clients delivered. This page is for architects who already have clients and want to ship cleaner first submissions.

✓Per-project, no commitment. Run one job, see what it tells you. If the corrections are off, you owe nothing.
✓Evidence on every claim. Each predicted correction links to the source — the prior cases that produced the same comment, the code section, the approved comparable projects.
✓Built for your workflow. Upload the drawing set, the zoning table, the egress narrative. Get back a one-page readiness sheet you can show a client.
✓Audit trail per package. If a town later disputes a choice you made, you have the comparable cases on file. Defensible.

Questions architects ask

What you'll want to know.

Is this just generic code-checking?

No — the predicted comments are calibrated to how this specific board has reviewed comparable projects, with the code section behind each. A generic checker misses the local reviewer’s patterns.

How accurate are the predicted comments?

They’re graded against real plan-review outcomes and the calibration is published. We flag low-confidence jurisdictions rather than overstate.

Does it replace my judgment or my stamp?

No. It surfaces what a reviewer is likely to flag so you resolve it before submission — you stay the licensed professional of record.

What does it cost to try?

Free to see what a board flags; $5.99 for an address-specific verdict; $49.99 for the full report with comparables and timeline.

One package. Free read.

Pick a recent project that already went through plan review. Run it through us. Compare what we predicted to what came back. If the signal's real, keep going.

Run a free package check Sign in